![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
... ... ...
What is it about rasfc that provokes people into saying idiotic things about the LGBT community? Is there some sort of stupidity projector inhabiting that newsgroup that turns people who otherwise appear to be not damned fools into drooling incompetents with neither a sense of empathy nor sufficient imagination (as writers!) to comprehend ordinary humans?
Exhibit umpteen, which I found when I cycled usenet in the hopes of finding something that would break my vague state of useless depression:
... what ... does one say? (Aside from, maybe, "How fortunate I am to not be a heterosexual person like you.")
And of course if I say half of what's in my head I'll be That Angry Queer again, never mind that I'm straight. But I know I'm pigeonholed from the last umpty-lump times someone said something that head-asplodingly blockheaded.
Also:
Whitney works on an LJ post about it, runs out of easily bringable-to-mind synonyms for 'stupid'.
Brooks [![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
brooksmoses] says, "I have a 1950s slang dictionary."
Whitney says, "... please share."
Exhibit umpteen, which I found when I cycled usenet in the hopes of finding something that would break my vague state of useless depression:
- Personally, it would be cool if bisexuals didn't exist. They're confusing to heterosexual people like me, and also to homosexuals. And I imagine some of the bisexuals themselves are frustrated because they (some of them) want monogamy but can't decide what one sex they want to be monogamous with.
... what ... does one say? (Aside from, maybe, "How fortunate I am to not be a heterosexual person like you.")
And of course if I say half of what's in my head I'll be That Angry Queer again, never mind that I'm straight. But I know I'm pigeonholed from the last umpty-lump times someone said something that head-asplodingly blockheaded.
Also:
Whitney works on an LJ post about it, runs out of easily bringable-to-mind synonyms for 'stupid'.
Brooks [
brooksmoses] says, "I have a 1950s slang dictionary."Whitney says, "... please share."
no subject
"a load of dingoes' kidneys"
So. What a load of dingoes' kidneys that poster's come up with there.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I note that I am not a heterosexual person like the one quoted. Thank goodness. I am an entirely different sort of heterosexual person who is unconfused by the bisexuality of most of his friends.
no subject
no subject
It must be very sad to be the original rasfc poster, and possessed of intellectual attainments incapable of extending their taxonomy system to encompass the tiny fraction of the observed world that is human social interaction.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Pity there are so many of them.
no subject
no subject
Would "don't worry your pretty little head about it, I'm sapiosexual and you don't qualify" work, do you think?
wat
Re: wat
no subject
no subject
But that means, if we took the bisexuals, and turned them all into transistors, we could solve the problem of trinary computers!
Pity I don't want to be a transistor...
no subject
no subject
That is all.
no subject
no subject
Personally, I think it would be cool if bigots didn't exist, because then I could live my life without having someone on the sidelines idly watching and calling out useless advice, like "You should pick a gender!" when I've managed to pick a person, which is more than many heterosexuals do.
no subject
<goes to rectify this>
no subject
"<nods sagely> Being mostly heterosexual I fortunately don't have that problem, but I can't tell you how frustrated I get due to not being able to decide whether I want to be monogamous with a right-hander or a left-hander. This is probably why I'm not married yet."
(Quoted for people who don't read rasfc.)
no subject
And, yes, that wins.
no subject
(And I want to be monogamous with this person dammit; that he happens to be a man is handy for having kids)
no subject
Husband: You don't know if they are. All you know is that they're posting on the Internet.
no subject
I’d like to believe in the stupidity-projector concept, really I would, and I’d love to apply it to many other situations, as it would make me feel better about the human race in general.
But, lets face it, actually *learning* things, gathering real facts and having real experiences, takes *work*, while making stupid shit up and running your mouth about it doesn’t.
And by doing this, you get to create your own little reality (not to be confused with objective reality), and get to have all of these things that you disapprove of in it, making your reality suck so that you can get that big ego-boost by having something to bitch about and oppose.
Living in a state of self-imposed delusion is soooo much easier then objectivity. It takes hardly any effort at all, and you also have the comfort of already knowing the answer to everything.
And yeah, re: the Angry Queer thing- it is funny, isn’t it? That to argue for an alternative viewpoint means that you’re automatically typed as a member of that group. I was just musing to a co-worker about how much more interesting my life would be if I actually *was* everything that I’ve been typed as. Especially amusing if I was all of them at once.
Whatever made you think that usenet could help your vague state of useless depression? Trawling through there actually *induces* that state in me (primarily by validating my tendencies towards misanthropy), which is why I stopped going there years ago.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Ah well. Maybe I should name my killfile "Ammit".
no subject